Main Article Content



Plastic waste management is a major trending issue in the world today, as the volume of waste increases on a daily basis. As the volume of plastic waste continues to rise, the negative consequences have resulted in critical environmental issues confronting many countries in various contexts. Many developed countries, however, have adopted the use of environmental policy instruments as a critical role in determining and improving the state of their environment. Germany is an excellent example of this, where the implementation of the Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) scheme as a policy has aided in the management of product end-of-life cycles and environmental improvements to manufacturing systems. This article discusses Germany's transition from the Producer Responsibility Organization to the EPR scheme. Data were collected from across all 16 federal states' waste management policies. The author was able to analyze and investigate Germany's transition from the Producer Responsibility Organization to the EPR scheme using the case study method. The literature review for this research framework includes the current sustainability state of the environment, the contextual framework, and formulation, assessment, and reports on plastic management.To support the research findings, field observations were conducted by scouting through the plastic bottle collection processes at a selected locations and store outlets in Germany. More research into how to expand EPR programs in Germany to allow for the recovery of other plastic forms is suggested by the researcher.

Extended producer responsibility, Germany, plastic waste, producer responsibility organization, recycling

Article Details

How to Cite
ALLEN-TAYLOR, K. O. (2022). A STUDY OF THE EXTENDED PRODUCER RESPONSIBILITY (EPR) SCHEME FOR PLASTIC WASTE MANAGEMENT IN GERMANY. Journal of Global Ecology and Environment, 16(4), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.56557/jogee/2022/v16i47723
Short Research Article


Science History Institute. Conflicts in Chemistry: The Case of Plastics; 2022.
(Accessed on February 8th, 2022)

Friedel R. Pioneer plastic: The making and selling of celluloid. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press; 1983.

Baekeland LH. The synthesis, constitution, and uses of Bakelite. Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry. 155. Reprinted in: C.A. Russell, D.C. Goodman (eds.), 1972, Science and the Rise of Technology Since 1800, Bristol: The Open UP, 1909;222228.

Gillis J, Baekeland LH. (oorspronkelijke documenten), verhandelingen van de Koninklijke Vlaamse Academie voor Wetenschappen, Letteren en Schone Kunsten van België, Klasse der Wetenschappen 27, Nr. 81; 1965.

Haynes W, Baekeland LH. In: Eduard Farber, Great Chemists, New York: Interscience Publishers; 1961.

Statista. Global Plastic Production from 1950 to 2020 (in million metric tons); 2022.
https://www.statista.com/statistics/282732/global-production-of-plastics-since-1950/ (accessed February 8th, 2022).

STAP. Plastics and the Circular Economy; 2018.

Geyer JR, Jambeck KLL. Production, use and fate of all plastics ever made, Sci. Adv. 2017;3(7):Article e1700782.
DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.1700782

IEEP. Moving Towards a Circular Economy for Plastics in the EU by 2030: Emma Watkins (IEEP) and Jean-Pierre Schweitzer (IEEP); 2018.

Lindhqvist T. Extended producer responsibility in cleaner production: Policy principle to promote environmental improvements of product systems IIIEE, Lund University; 2000.

IEEP. EPR in the EU Plastics Strategy and the Circular Economy: A Focus on Plastic Packaging; 2017.

Annexure H. National waste management strategy implementation South Africa Recycling Extended Producer Responsibility Status Quo Report; 2005.

OECD. Extended Producer Responsibility: A Guidance Manual for Governments, OECD, Paris, France; 2001.

Lindhqvist Thomas. Extended Producer Responsibility. In T. Lindhqvist, Extended Producer Responsibility as a Strategy to Promote Cleaner Products (1-5). Lund: Department of Industrial Environmental Economics, Lund University; 1992.

Haskell D. What is extended producer responsibility, edited for distribution to the zero waste network Wanganui; 2004.

Sascha T. Introduction to the German Federal System; 2017.

Broschek J. Historical Institutionalism and the Varieties of Federalism in Germany and Canada, Publius: The Journal of Federalism. 2011;42(4):662–87.

Ziblatt D. Rethinking the origins of federalism: Puzzle, Theory, and Evidence from Nineteenth-Century Europe, World Politics. 2004;57(1): 7098.

Available:https://geographic.org/maps/new2/germany_maps.html (accessed February 24th, 2022).

Robert KY. Case Study Research. Design and Methods, 4th ed; 1994.

Nakajima L, Vanderburg W. A description and analysis of the german packaging take-back system; 2006.

Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety. Ordinance on the Avoidance and Recovery of Packaging Wastes (Packaging ordinance Verpackungsverordnung – VerpackV1) of 21. August 1998, Federal Law Gazette. 2005;1:2379.

OECD. Extended producer responsibility phase 2 case study on the German packaging ordinance; 1998.

Available:www.iwm-nama.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/EN-Final_web-smaller_NAMA-Policy-Paper-EN.pdf: Germany’s Waste Management Policy Development: A Focus on Municipal Solid Waste.

Available:www.dw.com:https://www.dw.com/enplastic-waste-and-therecyclingmyth/a45746469 /
(Accessed February 19th, 2022)

(Accessed 23rd, February, 2022).

(Accessed 23rd, February, 2022)